Balancing ethics and productivity in return-to-work processes

Returning to work after a period of sick leave due to mental health challenges presents a complex web of ethical dilemmas and conflicting priorities. According to research from the University of Gothenburg, the goals of employers, healthcare providers, and insurance agencies often diverge, complicating efforts to support employees recovering from conditions like depression, anxiety, and stress-related disorders.

In Sweden, recommendations for improving return-to-work processes emphasise collaboration among employers, the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, and healthcare providers. While these stakeholders aim to facilitate employees’ reintegration, their priorities do not always align.

For example, the Swedish Social Insurance Agency advocates for gradual reintegration, allowing employees to focus on essential tasks. Employers, however, may hesitate to accommodate underperformance despite their rehabilitation obligations. At the same time, healthcare providers juggle their dual role as caregivers safeguarding patient autonomy and experts tasked with evaluating work ability.

The study also highlighted the risk associated with premature or overly optimistic assessments of an employee’s work ability. While returning to work can aid recovery by providing structure and purpose, it can also hinder progress if the individual is not fully prepared. Prolonged absence, on the other hand, may exacerbate mental health issues, creating a delicate balance for stakeholders to navigate.

READ MORE: How leaders can foster year-round mental health conversations

Another critical issue lies in assumptions about employees’ willingness to return. In some cases, the workplace itself may have contributed to the individual’s mental health challenges, complicating the motivation to reengage. Researchers suggested that interventions often overlook the personal adjustments required to sustain work ability.

“Defining work ability is about organising the workforce as productively as possible while respecting other values,” explained Thomas Hartvigsson, a practical philosophy and medical ethics researcher at the University of Gothenburg. “Different ways of structuring health insurance systems prioritise certain ethical values over others.”

Elisabeth Björk Brämberg, Associate Professor of Occupational Medicine and co-researcher on the study, emphasised the need for evidence-based approaches. “Most people on sick leave for common mental disorders return to work within 60 days,” she noted. “However, interventions aimed at supporting these individuals often lack robust scientific backing. It’s crucial to identify those needing additional support earlier in the process.”